Thread: Ghostbusters 3 Depends on Bill Murray and Might Have Ashton Kutcher
View Single Post
Old 03-01-2011, 05:30 PM   #25
Eklipse
BrushYo Mouf Like Colgate
 
Eklipse's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,645
Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight View Post
By the same stretch, Terminator. Movie should have ended right there. What did we get? Terminator 2.

Maybe operating from the assumption of "shit treatment" is stupid?

Especially considering the people involved had a lot to do with the original, completely unlike Terminator 3?

Or Ghostbusters 2 was hardly Terminator 2?

Or the game that took its cues from a prior proposed script was well received?

Go on. Explain how your example bears out yoru concerns at all, and isn't stupid as all fuck.
I'm just saying that I don't think GB really needs another sequel. I could see a remake, but not another movie.
Eklipse is offline   Reply With Quote