|
In a juvenile way? ***That's YOUR opinion. It's not fact. Stop it.
Let's go over the post shall we?
the shit stained undies angle he did often in the Attitude era?
I'm serious, Patterson was a big deal as a wrestler and deserves his acclaim sure, but everytime I think of him I think of
"HIM retired with simulated (I would hope) shit stained undies that he would threaten to smear people with."
Apparently that never happened?
"Not cool. Am I alone in this that that angle etched into people's mental landscape when thinking of the name Pat Patterson?"
No one asked this before. They must have something to prove. That's the mentality some people have. That's not my agenda, and if you think otherwise i don't know what to tell you. Maybe think twice before judging me as paranoid though.
Here I was not condoning the man's legacy while in between the lines asserting bluntly that I am a casual observer.
"Personally that's not how I'd like to see the man go out"
What an asshole I am for addressing the elephant in the room (WWE's penchant for exploiting superstar legacy's for the sake of them either still wanting or needing a paycheck, or because they really think all of us as wrestling fans don't remember things and simply won't care.
Why build someone up if you're going to shit on them in 20 years? And yes, I know there are no guarantees in life.
|