Thread: Are Warrior and Batista HOF candidates?
View Single Post
Old 03-03-2011, 03:26 PM   #1
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Are Warrior and Batista HOF candidates?
Let me preface this by saying we're not going by WWE standards but our own opinion on the HOF. Because, let's face it, by WWE standards, both are a lock.

I was just thinking how I absolutely believe Warrior is Hall of Fame bound, and does belong in the Hall.

Then I got to thinking about Batista. While, to me, it feels like he hasn't done quite as much, he has really done way more than Warrior and was in the company for double the amount of Warrior, and a mid to top star for 7 of those 8 years.

So, how do you feel about Batista being in the Hall of Fame? Does he belong? How about Warrior? Does he belong?

Discuss both The Ultimate Warrior and Batista in general in here.

Xero is offline   Reply With Quote