[Xero]

Hmm. I was going to come in here and talk about how ECW was never on the level of TNA. And money-wise, exposure and promotional power, they aren't. However, I decided to look up ECW on TNN's ratings, and they aren't really far off from TNA's.

http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrest...ecw/ecwtnn.htm

Date	Rating
August 27, 1999	0.9
September 3, 1999	1.0
September 10, 1999	0.9
September 17, 1999	0.7
September 24, 1999	0.9
October 1, 1999	0.7
October 8, 1999	0.9
October 15, 1999	1.2
October 22, 1999	1.2
October 29, 1999	0.8
November 5, 1999	1.1
November 12, 1999	0.9
November 19, 1999	0.9
November 26, 1999	1.1
December 3, 1999	1.0
December 10, 1999	1.2
December 17, 1999	1.0
December 24, 1999	1.1
December 31, 1999	0.9

2000

Date	Rating
January 7, 2000	1.2
January 14, 2000	1.2
January 21, 2000	1.3
January 28, 2000	1.0
February 4, 2000	1.0
February 11, 2000	1.1
February 18, 2000	1.2
February 25, 2000	1.1
March 3, 2000	1.3
March 10, 2000	1.1
March 17, 2000	0.8
March 24, 2000	0.8
March 31, 2000	1.1
April 7, 2000	0.9
April 14, 2000	1.1
April 21, 2000	0.9
April 28, 2000	0.9
May 5, 2000	0.8
May 12, 2000	0.9
May 19, 2000	0.7
May 26, 2000	0.8
June 2, 2000	0.8
June 9, 2000	0.8
June 16, 2000	0.8
June 23, 2000	0.8
June 30, 2000	0.9
July 7, 2000	0.9
July 14, 2000	0.7
July 21, 2000	0.9
July 28, 2000	1.0
August 4, 2000	0.8
August 11, 2000	0.9
August 18, 2000	1.0
August 25, 2000	0.8
September 1, 2000	1.0
September 8, 2000	1.0
September 15, 2000	0.8
September 22, 2000	0.8
September 29, 2000	0.7
October 6, 2000	0.6

Now, no, I don't think ECW could have done it, just thought this was interesting to note. They fluctuated a lot more, but they averaged about a .9, maybe .3 points off from TNA's average.