Quote:
Originally Posted by XL
So, when you state your opinion on things your're being "objective", but when others do the same, they're "blindly marking"?
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
|
No, it just seems to me most here critisize me for not liking every single thing WWE does. As I said before, it's that kind of logic that has put WWE in the boat of not listening to their fans. Ppl here like accusing me of marking out, then turn around and do the same thing. The only difference is I don't state my views as fact. It's real easy to take something out of context then try to pass it off as my ignorance.
The bottom line for me is if you think everything the WWE does is good, you are a WWE mark. Pointing out the flaws WWE has and expecting better quality from them is being objective. Or at least that's what I consider the definition of the word to be. Taking the approach that everything WWE churns out is gold doesn't make it so...