View Single Post
Old 09-24-2011, 08:02 PM   #22
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicky Fives View Post
I have more of a problem with Michael Cole being on both shows than I do with Booker on commentary..... replace Cole for Striker and I'd be happy....
This is what I'd be a fan of. Striker can bring proper analysis and smart-ass edge to color, while Booker can be his over-the-top energetic self. Striker is still, for my money, the best commentator working in the WWE. You have William Regal who is getting better all the time, too, but let him keep working on NXT and FCW for a while.

Josh Mathews is another favourite of mine. I'd be all for him replacing Michael Cole as "The Voice of the WWE." It's not that I hate Cole -- I find him entertaining and he knows what he's doing. But I'd much rather see him leave the booth and become a heel manager, or something.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote