Thread: Should they bring back the Hardcore title?
View Single Post
Old 10-30-2011, 11:05 PM   #4
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
All the talent show up on all the brands as it is, so it would be moot.

They don't need more titles. You can make a guy look good and push a guy without a title. Honestly, if anything, I'd get rid of one of the midcard titles. That way you have the WWE title, the WHC title which would be the equivalent of the 80s/early 90s IC belt where main players would go for it (essentially being WWE title B, which it is) and the IC belt for the midcard. Throw in the tag belts and the Divas belt.

There really doesn't need to be anymore than that because, again, guys can be pushed to the moon without a title, sustain a push and get over. As XL said, it's about the writing.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote