Thread: The Rematch Clause
View Single Post
Old 12-07-2011, 04:12 PM   #7
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
It's a good clause. If you have a problem with things getting stale, that's on the writing. It can be done well and it can be done poorly.

Well: Del Rio's rematch against Punk on Raw last week.

Poorly: "I have a rematch clause and because of that we will have another match at the next PPV"

Like CSL said, there's a lot TV time to fill. And that's a good way to do it.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote