Quote:
Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla
Can you explain how it's bad for wrestling?
|
I may be exaggerating in saying that it's WORSE to be champion via MITB than to never win at all but it's definitely not a good thing. Winning with the MITB initially was fine because first of all it made sense with Edge's gimmick. He was GOOD but he was also a cheap opportunist cunt that made him even BETTER. And the way Edge did it made the most sense. It seemed smart when he did it. But then RVD actually cashed in for a match and won. This made future winners look like pussy faggots. And now everyone does it. They just wait until a champion is down and then get a cheap victory. This completely makes me feel like MITB winners could not win it on their own. They suck. They are shitty mid carders who win a spot fest match and then cheap ass their way to winning. It hurts their credibility when their title runs suck too.
JOHN CENA WWE TOP STAR also mentioned this in his Del Rio feud. He totally pointed out how MITB is BULLSHIT.
And one last thing:
MITB can still work the way it is used if a
heel does it.
dANIEL bRYAN is a babyface who is praised for his wrestling ability and then he goes and cashes in his cheap ass MITB BS on ANOTHER BABYFACE....AFTER HE HIMSELF SAID HE WOULD NOT UNTIL WRESTLEMANIA and wins it?
He has no credibility and he is a perfect represenation of 95% of the stupid IWC that is nothing but dumbass socially awkward faggot white kids in their early 20s in their moms basement who also like star wars and post dumb shit on 4chan