Thread: King of the Ring 2012?
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2012, 08:50 PM   #9
Anybody Thrilla
Cranky Kong
 
Anybody Thrilla's Avatar
 
Posts: 78,671
Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Anybody Thrilla makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicky Fives View Post
If it isn't a 32-Man or 64-man tournament to make it seem more important, I don't care......8-Man isn't enough.....
Having a 32 or 64 man tournament presents the event as if there are actually that many people who are potentially worthy of being King of the Ring. A smaller tournament adds an air of prestige to even being involved. Any more than 16 is too much, I think.
Anybody Thrilla is offline   Reply With Quote