Thread: Why so serious? Is that required of a WWE Champ?
View Single Post
Old 02-14-2012, 02:06 PM   #16
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Yeah, there just needs to be a good blend. I see no reason why Brodus Clay couldn't be a future champion without even changing his gimmick. The goofiness of the gimmick as no barring on the fact that he seems like he could legit destroy people.

If they wanted it, Santino could be the same way. With his background and skills, he can be a badass in the ring while still having fun and being goofy otherwise.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote