Quote:
Originally Posted by Londoner
Yeah, im, talking about being negative for the sake of it. Mine were just honest opinions on what just happened, you're judging rock/cena before its even happened. Big difference. Nice of you to leave out my positive comments made in those threads btw.
|
HIDDEN MESSAGE: I bet if he replies at all, it doesn't go above one line of text!
Nice of you to take a clearly jokey post and feel the need to be super serious about it. In case you didn't know, that winking, smiling face isn't because he's shutting one eye so he can clearly get a good look at the darkness of your soul, it was in fact meant to convey the playful nature of the following post. Please bear that in mind when people make that gesture to you. I should also apologise for not having a full disclaimer saying that those posts I just found in the first page of your posting history not to be fully representative of every post you have ever made. I'll write to stand-up comedians and ask them to do the same thing when they generalise.
However, as anyone who clicks on that "find more posts by Londener" will find, it is representative of just how tiresome your posts are.
Since you have already devolved to this level, we may as well take it all the way. I'm glad that you felt the need to wind in your scope about what types of negativity should be derided and which should be held up as shining examples of "honest opinions" as it clearly shows that you're either oblivious to what an opinion is or just lacking those all important IQ points. If you feel you need to defend yourself in anyway because I made you look quite foolish with that post, I would apologise but I think you did most of the hard work in doing that yourself.
Now let's look at statistics: between last Wrestlemania and this one coming, I
personally have really enjoyed 3 singles matches John Cena has had. Thinking back to Cena matches since he won his first title,
my recollection is of matches where his opponent was of a technician variety, someone who can control the match or a faster, high-flyer. That's not to say Cena can't make a match himself, he can. We've all seen it prior to that title win but his current style that got him over with the majority doesn't really allow for that.
Now I I'm also watching classic Raw's right now so I know The Rock and I have to say that
in my opinion, The Rock is pretty similar in that respect, but lucky for him he had a lot of guys to work with that could do that. As soon as he feuds with Mr. Ass for instance, it goes downhill
for me. Add these factors together and you have a match that statistically is not going to be
for me.
So with that in mind and after a year long build that has also left me disinterested, why is yours an "honest opinion" and my statistical opinion not? Or is it another post based in mediocrity, hoping to sail by with an off the cuff "oh, his opinion differs from mine, he's just trying to be cool as what I think is the only thing that matters!"?
Please don't think you've made me mad or anything to that effect just because I dared to write a few paragraphs. I'm just very tired of posts like this and ones like "I BET THE IWC CHANGES IT'S MIND TOMORROW!!!111!" when all you have to do is the tiniest bit of research to see that the IWC is not a groupthink but it's different opinions being vocal at different times.