Thread: DLC to Bridge Sequels: Yay or Nay?
View Single Post
Old 03-17-2012, 08:43 PM   #4
SlickyTrickyDamon
Quark is Less Impressed.
 
SlickyTrickyDamon's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,371
SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I guess they needed to walk a fine line with DLC being important or just another random mission added on.

I don't agree with what they did with the day one DLC since it is apparent it was on the Disc, but I do like how Mass Effect's 2 DLC affects the third game. The DLC in Mass Effect 2 is worth buying and a lot of fun. So, it's fun and it makes Mass Effect 2 and 3 easier to beat. I don't see a huge problem with that.

The Mass Effect 1 DLC just seemed to be just a random mission and it was pretty lame.
SlickyTrickyDamon is offline   Reply With Quote