View Single Post
Old 04-16-2012, 03:59 AM   #39
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. C View Post
I’m worried Lesnar vs. Cena is being given away early in a similar fashion to how Goldberg vs. Rock was given away at Backlash 2003.
I thought it was given away way too soon as well but then the more I thought about it... How much of a high is WWE coming off of with WrestleMania? For one year, ALL everyone was looking forward to was Rock-Cena. Then it happened and there was this "Well... now what?" feeling.

They have to do SOMETHING at Extreme Rules to soften the fall off after WrestleMania which stood to be way worse of a falloff than typical after Cena-Rock. So in that way, they did need to have a bigger than usual match and Cena-Lesnar was pretty much the best option.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote