View Single Post
Old 04-26-2012, 06:46 PM   #1528
Droford
 
Posts: 52,478
Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanso View Post
Drofords support argument is less about QBs taken in the same draft, and more about how shotty the rate of 1st round qbs are.
My point still stands about QBs taken 1/2 in the same year though..

I shudder to think what happens if Tannehill goes #3, it'll be like 1999 with Couch/McNabb/A. Smith. Teams panic "OMG the QBs are all gone" and go rush to a QB that under normal circumstances wouldn't be touched before the 3rd round where expectations wouldn't be so high. Tannehill WILL DEFINITELY be a bust if hes drafted top 5. I have less doubt about that then saying that RG3 will be a huge bust. The good news is he's not projected to go top 5, but I could see someone panic at the last minute..
Droford is offline