Thread: You know, I thought the Rolling Stone lists were horrible...
View Single Post
Old 05-04-2012, 12:45 AM   #4
Vastardikai
Taller than Adam Cole
 
Vastardikai's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,876
Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSL View Post
it mentions why Hendrix, Johnson, Clapton and co. (the"traditional" guitarists) aren't in it in the opening paragraph
I didn't see the explanation, but I understand where they're going. It's bullshit, because I'd argue the inclusion of Skrillex at the expense of even Kirk Windstein (Crowbar), Woody Weatherman (COC), or Tim Sult (Clutch) is a travesty.

More than that, I'd probably put Willie Nelson in my personal top ten of guitar players. And how can they disqualify Hendrix when he used his guitar playing talents for "unique and exploratory ends?"
Vastardikai is offline   Reply With Quote