Thread: Are longer movies inherently better?
View Single Post
Old 05-10-2012, 01:23 PM   #24
OssMan
The Classic Dylan Staples
 
OssMan's Avatar
 
Posts: 51,462
OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)OssMan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Bollocks at 30 extra minutes allowing you to be more invested in a movie. I've seen two hour shitfests like Obsessed which could have been an hour longer and it would still be a rubbish with unrelatable characters. Meanwhile all it took was 10 minutes of watching Up to be invested in that.
OssMan is offline   Reply With Quote