Thread: Are longer movies inherently better?
View Single Post
Old 05-10-2012, 07:26 PM   #29
Skippord
I'm Mr. White Christmas
 
Skippord's Avatar
 
Posts: 44,526
Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Skippord makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OssMan View Post
Bollocks at 30 extra minutes allowing you to be more invested in a movie. I've seen two hour shitfests like Obsessed which could have been an hour longer and it would still be a rubbish with unrelatable characters. Meanwhile all it took was 10 minutes of watching Up to be invested in that.
was Obsessed that movie with Beyonce killing Ali Larter? or am I thinking of something else?
Skippord is offline   Reply With Quote