Thread: Can TNA be competition to the WWE now?
View Single Post
Old 06-06-2004, 06:06 PM   #36
Jordan
It's a blood match!
 
Jordan's Avatar
 
Posts: 27,385
Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jordan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MVP

2. TNA's focus in on matches for the most part. Promos and angles aren't as consistent as on a WWE program. The average "mark" (note the difference between a "smark" and a "mark") is interested in entertainment even if it means deviating from the traditional wrestling aspect by including redundant angles, prolonged promos, and boobies .
I disagree, most people I know that don't watch wrestling anymore, don't watch because there isn't enough wrestling, and if there is wrestling, then it isn't very good. Raw has picked up a bit, but not like it could. Four minute matches with Matt Hardy and Christain are just unaceptable, they need fifteen minutes, then watch the raitings go up. People watch wrestling for wrestling. People have this idea that the casual fan watches wrestling for the diva's or the angles, while they may when the angles are good, mainly they just like to have fun while watching people kill each other.
Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote