|
Alot of the angles everyone's providing are designed solely to end feuds. " Retire the deadman, JBL sucks, the cruiserweights are rancid",blah, blah, blah.While all of things things are mostly true,if handled right, these things dont have to end right away. When Bradshaw loses to Guerrero, put him in a feud with John Cena for the U.S. Title.
The Undertaker jobbing to everyone is the worst idea i've heard in a while, and its been pissing me off that everyone "likes him" but wants him to lose. Come guys. Let the guy continue to entertain us, he's a conerstone of the WWE. Jobbing to everyone all the way down to Orlando Jordan isn't gonna make the fans happy.
Lastly, one of the great things that i remembered about storylines from 1998-2001 was that when feuds ended, there was still "ttension" between wrestlers. Triple H and SCSA werent always involved, but we know they hated each other. We knew Kurt Angle hated the Rock. We knew that Kane could show up at anytime and beat up anyone. And we all knew that the Undertaker and Kane had a whole lot of history, but they had plenty of side feuds. There was always a chance that these two could meet up again.
What i'm saying is this is how things need to be. Guerrero and Bradshaw, Mordecai and the Undertaker, Cena, Booker T , RVD, all of these guys need to be involved somehow with each other and be able to spin a story like it was no problem. Thats why Jericho and Angle had such success: they feuded with literally EVERYONE. Lets get some emotion into the writing, ya monkeys.
|