|
Austin was a great draw for a few years, but Taker's been a staple for like two decades, much of which he's put asses in seats consistently, got some of the most consistent pops, and had some incredible matches. I have problems with the total laziness he often shows, and other niggling bits, but the Undertaker has been a top-tier wrestler and one of the workhorses of wrestling for almost as long as Mark's had the monicker.
Austin may have made the Attitude Era, but Undertaker was a huge hand in it. Not to mention both before and after.
Personally, I think that's why Taker's winning. I know it's why I voted for him. I loved watching Austin come in and wreck shit, and I probably like him more than the Undertaker in a lot of respects, but....
|