|
I chose Austin. I don't feel like this is a very difficult decision. Austin was a better wrestler, a bigger draw, better on the mic, and didn't have a 2 hour entrance. The Undertaker "being around forever" isn't saying much of anything. Austin's run at the top changed the direction of the company, while the Undertaker has been involved in multiple eras of Wrestlecrap. Yes, he has had some epic matches at the last 4 Wrestlemanias, but lets not forget for every Shawn Michaels/Triple H classic, there were the Kama/Mabel/King Kong Bundy/Kamala/Giant Gonzales shitfests. I know some people prefer him, but I think Austin is easily the choice here.
|