|
If Armstrong had tested positive, he would have been banned years ago. Those things are merely rumours with no substance, and the only people with the 'evidence' refuse to bring it public. Yeah, sounds legit. And witnesses don't count as someone testing positive, for them it's about them having their own convictions squashed. I have had much respect for Hincapie over the years, but him admitting to doping and then allegedly testifying against Lance so he himself receives no sanctions also seems rather suss wouldn't you say?
Until I see hard evidence that he doped he's innocent in my eyes. But of course, if proof ever is presented of course I'll be upset with the guy.
And if you truly believe that's why he doesn't acknowledge the USADA's challenge, then I believe you no very little about the man and the sport.
|