Thread: QUESTION - Should the WWE employ a "Best of 7 series" format? (as we see in the Pros)
View Single Post
Old 06-10-2004, 07:59 PM   #18
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Triple threat matches, Fatal Four-ways, Six-man tags, etc.


Triple threat matches, Fatal Four-ways, Six-man tags, etc.

One thing I realized - if this "Best of 7" thing ever took place, it would get pretty boring seeing constant one-on-one matches. Therefore - the "best of 7 thing" can also be applied to other matches.

For example. Let's say the following wrestlers are currently feuding with one another in the "Best of 7" series.

-Shawn Michaels vs. Randy Orton
-Chris Benoit vs. Kane.
-Triple H vs. Shelton Benjamin


Let's say we see a 6 man tag match (HHH/Orton/Kane vs. HBK/Benoit/Benjamin). The team that wins the 6 man tag match, gets '1' victory each (in their respective individual best of 7 series).

Fatal 4 ways/Elimination Chamber matches/Triple threats - HBK vs. Benot vs. Orton vs. Kane --> Whoever gets the victory, gets a victory in their individual series (i.e. if HBK pins someone like KAne during the fatal four way, he'd still get a recorded 'victory' over Orton
in their 'best of 7' series. This same principle can be applied to Elimination Chamber matches, and triple threat matches.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote