Thread: QUESTION - Should the WWE employ a "Best of 7 series" format? (as we see in the Pros)
View Single Post
Old 06-10-2004, 08:12 PM   #19
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stickman
I remember the Booker T vs Chris Beniot series. I also believe The Hardy's and E&C had a best of seven. The concept was great at the beginning but by match three I stopped caring.


Variations can be made to make the series more interesting (i.e. different matches, etc.).

As far as the Hardy's/E&C go, their best of FIVE series helped spawn one of the greatest tag team rivalries in the history of the WWE. All 4 of these guys became 'more over' because of it.

YOU personally may have stopped caring, but I think it's safe to say that an overwhelming majority of the fans loved it.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote