Thread: QUESTION - Should the WWE employ a "Best of 7 series" format? (as we see in the Pros)
View Single Post
Old 06-10-2004, 08:17 PM   #20
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThugLife
No way. The tournament will become to predicteble to early knowing WWE


In the early stages - most series' would be predictable. For example - it would be obvious that Triple H would defeat Chuck Pulumbo if the two men faced each other in the 1st round.

HOWEVER - what if Pulumbo won ONE match CLEANLY over Triple H? (so Triple H won the series 4-1). Just that one victory alone may get Pulumbo a bit more 'over' with the fans.

WHAT IF - Triple H and Shawn Michaels were in the same half of the draw? (and so people could anticipate a potential future showdown between the two men. Their "anticipated" feud could be built up well in advance.


WHAT IF - We saw an upset? On Smackdown - What if Billy Kidman defeated Rob Van Dam in 7 matches? (4-3). Certainly - no one would see that coming. Kidman would go over as result.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote