[Heyman]

Originally Posted by jonster I like the sound of the idea, but what would be done with the current champions, if you're giving the winner of the tournament the belt?

I'm thinking that this idea could go into effect after one of the Wrestlemania's (either after next Wrestlemania, or the one after that). If this were to happen, all of the titles would become 'vacated'.

I'm thinking that things such as "The World title" or "IC title", etc. would become kind of like the Stanley Cup, World Series ring, etc. (in that you compete for it all year long.....as opposed to carrying "it" the entire year and having it change hands so much).

So for example - it could read like something like this:

World Champion 2005/06: Triple H
Intercontinental Champion 2005/06: Randy Orton
United States Champion 2005/06: John Cena

Also instead of best of 7, best of 5 would work better with ppv's generally being 4 weeks apart (1 match every week on raw, the decider on ppv)

The best of 5 idea is also workable. I like the reasoning that you gave.

My premise for having a 'Best of 7' however, was that the fans could really experience and actual INTENSE feud. Best of 5's are great, but they can be a bit too short. With a best of 7, the WWE can really create long and lasting rivalries.......of which the fans can talk about for a long time (i.e. Angle/Lesnar, The Rock/HHH, etc.).