View Single Post
Old 09-02-2012, 02:13 PM   #32
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace3025 View Post
I disagree. Had Brock beaten Cena he could've taken the WWE "hostage" beating up whomever he felt like. Running his mouth, and becoming an "undesirable", like punk last summer. HHH as CEO would ask him to stop trashing "his" company and then Brock breaks his arm or whatever, and lead to the only way of stopping Brock is to beat him.

Instead, him making demands after losing was silly and we got the result of Brock being mad HHH wasn't playing nice. Which culminated with HHH being in control of the feud.

Monsters should always be in control, that's why they're monsters
Your issue seems to be with the direction they went with it. Brock literally could have still done everything you just said if they wanted to go that direction after he lost the match to Cena. Getting his shoulders pinned to the mat for a 3 count did not prevent him coming out and beating up whoever he wanted and "taking WWE hostage".
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote