[Jonster]

Originally Posted by Heyman The best of 5 idea is also workable. I like the reasoning that you gave. My premise for having a 'Best of 7' however, was that the fans could really experience and actual INTENSE feud. Best of 5's are great, but they can be a bit too short. With a best of 7, the WWE can really create long and lasting rivalries.......of which the fans can talk about for a long time (i.e. Angle/Lesnar, The Rock/HHH, etc.).

That was the only thing about the best of 5 I didn't like, it being short, but they would be more intense. Can wrestler X come back from 2-nil down to win 3-2? It's more likely to happen than winning 4 in a row, but still in a 7 series that would majorly put someone over.
What I just typed had no real point.

They could do a slight variation if say the series was drawn. 3-3 last match - double count-out.
They could either go with a rematch or carrying on the match.
Or the next round could confusingly be a triple threat best of 7, and it would be whoever won the most goes through. Although if that kept continuing (ie a triple threat finishing 3-3-1), it would be confusing.