Thread: Should Bret have lost @ Survivor Series?
View Single Post
Old 06-11-2004, 12:38 PM   #38
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepsi Man
Should Bret have jobbed? Hell yes. It would've made perfect sense.

However, on the whole issue, Vince was completely in the wrong. I don't say he was wrong for forcing Bret to do the job, but he was wrong for pretending he was going to give Bret what he wanted, then going out there and pulling that shit. After over a decade in the company, the least Bret was owed was honesty from his employer.
Ironically, when the WWE was bitching about Austin leaving, Vince and JR were going on about the fact that Steve said he'd be there after they "supposedly" worked things out, and he bailed anyways.

Well, tough shit, guys. After something like the "Montreal Screwjob," you've set a major precedent of distrust.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote