Thread: Would you build your company around a "Nash" or a "Bryan"?
View Single Post
Old 09-18-2012, 07:41 PM   #2
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathtotheSwiss View Post
Being small doesn't mean being uncharismatic. Plenty of "small" guys have been extremely entertaining. I think the guys with no talent on the mic' should serve as enhancement talent unless they get the right manager and outside of Heyman I doubt the WWE is planning on bringing back managers and valets in a meaningful way.
I didn't say being small meant uncharismatic. I threw "less charismatic" in there just as a way to narrow it down to the more "vanilla midgety" type without using the term "vanilla midget".

I don't think having no talent on the mic though should automatically equal enhancement talent. That's a waste. If you've got a guy who's really talented in the ring, don't just waste him like that. Give him a division based solely on an in ring spectacle that he can shine in without having to work the mic.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote