View Single Post
Old 09-27-2012, 03:48 PM   #35210
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Warrior View Post
I can't remember the last time I saw more than one diva's segment. 100% agree, divas having limited drawing potential and shouldn't get much time on there own. That being said, I feel the same way about comedy wrestlers also.
Yeah, anything that isn't focused on an eventual main event draw. Like the cruiserweight division is WCW. Very useful. People loved it. Should never have gotten a ton of segments on the show. It's a gimmick division. A great one. But you were never gonna headline your biggest show of the year with a cruiserweight title match or anything. Same with divas. Ideally, I'd have one segment devoted to the divas, one segment devoted to the cruiserweights and you can focus the rest of the show on the rest of the roster who are on the "main card". The part of the roster who can move around up to the main event and such.

I'm just speaking to divisions though. As for comedy wrestlers, I think it depends on their place. I think there's room for a guy like Santino and a guy like Brodus Clay on the same show. They both serve a purpose.
#1-norm-fan is offline