Thread: RAW does lowest rating...in 15 years!!!
View Single Post
Old 10-04-2012, 12:53 PM   #3
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Missed this before.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curd View Post
WWE could do more with online distribution such as offering online membership to WWE.com for behind-the-scenes peeks and other exclusive content. The fact that McMahon is making such a big deal about TV ratings means that someone who reports to him, e.g. the VP of Marketing & Distribution (or whatever they call it now), was responsible for proposing the Hulu and Netflix deals.
Or that Vince is a bipolar twit with no clue as to what he's doing. Remember, tis is the dude who heralded the smark era and had a huge hand in the rise of the internet, but he hates both.

In fact, this seems more like a half-ass "keeping up with the times" deal, the sort of thing Vince and WWE do every few years against their will.

also, since TV sponsors are still a big deal in terms of money, one could be concerned with one and still embrace the other.

Of course, they would have to really embrace the online market.

Note to Clox: With two fingers slashed open, I can still type without looking like I smashed my face on a keyboard.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote