Thread: Has WWE given up on the Zack Ryder experiment?
View Single Post
Old 10-13-2012, 05:03 PM   #34
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gertner View Post
He is what he is: a mid carder. I'm not sure what you people were expecting out of this?
Here's my issue with the term "mid carder" nowadays...

I think a mid carder should actually be able to compete and be competitive in the middle of the card.

Ryder is a jobber who gets wins on Superstars once in a while. Unless we're counting the second match of Superstars as the midcard of WWE, he's just a glorified jobber. There barely are any true midcarders in fact. There's main eventers, guys who stick around and win matches with no real plan to move them up and then there's interchangable filler. Ryder falls into the latter.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote