Thread: WWE in need
View Single Post
Old 11-15-2012, 11:31 AM   #39
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Sheep View Post
There's no evidence to prove that either of us are right or wrong, so no I'm not grasping at straws.
I listed evidence. You may not like the evidence, but that trend certainly demonstrates a probability.

Meanwhile, your argument is disingenuous and pointless. So yes, you are grasping at straws.

You have no actual reason to believe it would be worth their while. There's plenty of reason to believe it wouldn't be, however.

If what you mean is that there is no way for either of us to see into the future and get an exact set of figures pertaining to buyrate, attendance and revenue, then yes. That's kind of stupid, though, as it renders almost any discussion about future events moot. It screams of a child telling his parents that they can't predict the future, and just because sticking a finger in the light socket hurt before doesn't mean it will this time.

Otherwise, you have failed to make any significant case for WWE benefiting from a big PPV overseas. and now, you are grasping at straws.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote