Thread: Should John Cena be the World Heavyweight Champion?
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2012, 10:22 PM   #37
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,524
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
Why do people always say "____ doesn't need the title" as opposed to thinking if maybe the title needs them?

If someone is "too big" for the title, doesn't that mean that them holding it would make the title look pretty damn prestigious? That kind of thinking is what gives you belts that look like shit.

Hogan didn't "need" the title. Austin didn't "need" the title. They made it look like something to strive for by holding it though. That's the point.
I agree with this thinking. I'm not saying that John Cena should be WWE Champion all the time, but I think it makes it look more meaningful when someone wins the title if it has been sitting on the top guys.

Right now CM Punk as WWE Champion is working fine. I can understand them keeping that title there. In fact, I would not mind it if they kept the WWE Title on him until late spring/early summer next year. With two World Titles, however, they do have the opportunity to have one title sitting on the biggest/best. The biggest is easily John Cena.

And I entirely agree with the proposition that the WWE needs to do something with the World Titles to make their separate existence still justifiable.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote