Thread: MLB Exhibition Games 2013 Thread
View Single Post
Old 12-17-2012, 09:11 PM   #34
Hanso Amore
You can't teach that
 
Hanso Amore's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,337
Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Edgar View Post
The Dickey trade is finalized and I'm listening to people say that the Mets got a "great prospect package." I remember about 8-9 years ago when the Twins sent AJ Pierzynski to SF for a boatload of prospects such as Liriano, Boof Bonser and Joe Nathan and were praised for stealing from SF in an incredible trade. Since then SF has won 2 World Series and the Twins have not won a playoff series. These trades look good and sparkly but you can never guarantee prospects. However, with where the Mets franchise is it is probably the best option for them, but I just get peeved about the prospect rhetoric.
I'm pretty sure that was a great package considering ah wanna mid tier catcher at best

Nathan was an all star and liriano had a few aces seaaons despite injury. Jays can hope they get that good of production.
Hanso Amore is offline