View Single Post
Old 01-01-2013, 08:16 AM   #38989
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Couple quick thoughts...

Are we all in agreement that Austin's face turn is the greatest ever and should be looked at when the current writers decide that someone like The Miz or ADR should turn face?

And is it just me or does the way WWE currently writes television ruin WrestleMania in the long term? You can have these matches between The Rock and ______ because if you wanna see The Rock wrestle you have no choice but to pay for it. But as for the full-time roster, everyone wrestles everyone on free TV. Why the hell should I have cared about Randy Orton vs Kane last year considering the fact that it's a match I could easily see on free TV?

This is a big problem and why WWE needs to build more weekly TV stories around non-match related storylines. If Hogan and Andre had faced each other 4 times in tag and triple threat matches in the weeks leading up to WrestleMania 3 it wouldn't have been nearly as eventful when they finally squared off. But for some reason WWE feels like seeing two guys go at it constantly on free TV makes people wanna see the outcome for 50 bucks. They're fucking retards for not making the simple connection.

Okay, so that last thought wasn't so "quick". But anyway...
#1-norm-fan is offline