|
So what exactly is the problem with having a reliable body look into the potential effects in a way that really hasn't been done before?
Seems like gamers have the same problem the anti-gamers do: they work backwards from the answer they want and try and justify it.
Why not let a serious organisation do a most likely accurate investigation and possibly clear the air on an issue that has already led to numerous lawsuits, taxpayer expenses, and wasted hours in legislative bodies from town to federal level?
And while we're at it, why not do the same for firearms?
|