Thread: Bret Hart says that Triple H "isn't great" and that "he's never had a great match"
View Single Post
Old 02-01-2013, 08:55 PM   #85
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Though the ending was quite Russo-esque.

And it's not like having a pretty good idea of who's coming out on top hampers the match. See: The Undertaker having classic matches with predictable outcomes four years straight. It was a culmination. Like Austin over HBK. Like Hogan in the 80's/90's. Like a ton of classic matches. And like I said, I'll take the story of two guys looking like they are absolutely incapable of being pinned or made to submit for an hour to two top guys getting pinned at the first sign of a power move every five minutes. The journey was better with HBK and Bret. The clusterfuck ending didn't exactly save it.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote