View Single Post
Old 06-19-2004, 03:00 AM   #30
toxic rooster
adjective noun
 
toxic rooster's Avatar
 
Posts: 30,417
toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazz
Jeffers is shit alot of the time, you don't need him, and he dives.
Works for van Nistelrooy . And Ashley Cole, for that matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazz
You have Henry, Bergkamp, Reyes and Alliediere to get goals
Bergkamp is aging, Reyes is more of an attacking midfielder and Aliadiere is probably a bit underdone - especially when he gets put in the situation of being out for several months with an injury and gets thrown straight back in the deep end, like the FA cup semi-final.

When we threw it away last time, all the doomsayers were crapping on about our over-reliance on Henry. This past season he was deadset on fire, but I can't see his good form lasting another whole season for Arsenal. Backed up with Reyes, Bergkamp and Aliadiere, it worries me.
toxic rooster is offline