|
I still think it makes NO sense for Paul Heyman not to have put some sort of reward for himself on the line. Heyman could have very easily have had Triple H put his status as Chief Operating Officer on the line. The only way I've been able to kayfabe rationalise this in my head is that control of the WWE would piss off investors and they would just fire Heyman because he didn't own majority shares and Heyman can't force Vince McMahon to put his stock on the line.
This feud probably should have had Vince McMahon more heavily involved, though, since Brock did F-5 him.
|