Thread: What would a Paul Heyman run TNA look like today?
View Single Post
Old 04-11-2013, 05:47 AM   #24
whiteyford
Out Of Step
 
whiteyford's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,059
whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
TNA has pretty much unlimited finances to an extent, Sting is reportedly on 500K a year, Flair was on between 2 & 400K aledgedly, and a lot that is/was paid by Panda Energy rather than TNA. ECW made stars, the amount of talent that was raided from there was ridiculous, even if when they joined the big two they were going in as midcard guys. TNA has always presented itself as WWE-lite, for me that was always their problem, they had/have an amazing roster of talent but fail to capitilise on what made them different, they had an actual tag division at one point that people cared about, womens matches that drew them their highest ratings consistently and the X division. Even the six sided ring was unique. When I catch TNA now it just looks like a watered down version of Smackdown.
whiteyford is offline   Reply With Quote