Quote:
Originally Posted by DTTS
I think Mark Calloway's words should be taken as proof. I don't see the motivation behind lying about this.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTTS
I didn't cite any "proofs". I cited an explanation that to any reasonable person is vastly more plausible than the secret old-school wrestling conspiracy you and CSL have concocted in your heads.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Your "proofs" that "destroy" the other side of Taker saying it wasn't planned and Jim Ross' commentary being uncharacteristic are fucking facepalm-worthy though.
|
You're doing it wrong.
I didn't cite "proofs" to "destroy" your version of events. I cited an explanation. That I think Undertaker's words should be taken as evidence toward the great possibility that the second bump was unplanned is not what I used to "destroy" anything.
So you searched the thread for a single instance of me using the word "proof" and what did it get you?
Nowhere. In no way is it likely that you were referring to my mention of Undertaker's assertion as the proof to destroy "the other side of Taker saying it wasn't planned".
Maybe you meant something else?