Thread: So if Foley wasn't supposed to fall through the top of the cell
View Single Post
Old 07-04-2013, 12:58 AM   #115
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTTS View Post
There are no facts that support the conspiracy theory that you and CSL have latched onto. That even assertions by the people involved are to be taken as proof supporting their "guilt"
I hate to steal others catchphrases here...

But you've been stuck in strawman mode for this entire page. I explained very clearly earlier how CSL and myself were not saying "Taker saying it was unplanned proves it was planned" but instead "Taker saying it was unplanned doesn't prove it was unplanned". And now you've come BACK to the "assertions by people involved are taken to be proof supporting their guilt" thing. You're so stuck in this strawman you've become impossible to talk to.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote