Thread: Has the move to 3 hours been a good one for Raw?
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2013, 06:46 PM   #63
SlickyTrickyDamon
Quark is Less Impressed.
 
SlickyTrickyDamon's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,371
SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
To anybody who Put "bad move" do you think they would have had a 20+ minute match with Daniel Bryan, Orton and Kane Vs. the Shield if they didn't have 3 hours to spend? Hell no. Wrestling for wrestling's sake on a wrestling show is a good thing. If they start having longer matches on Raw they can gain more stamina and endurance to have longer matches on PPVs.

WCW's three hours were bad because like Gertner said they showed the same old shit every week. Even a great cruiserweight match can get old fast. How many of us remember "YOU CAN'T POWER BOMB KIDMAN!?" They did the same match every week.
SlickyTrickyDamon is offline   Reply With Quote