Thread: Has the move to 3 hours been a good one for Raw?
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2013, 06:57 PM   #66
SlickyTrickyDamon
Quark is Less Impressed.
 
SlickyTrickyDamon's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,371
SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
The problems with tag teams aren't just the time needed to establish them. There aren't many people who want to share the stage with a partner. Also it only seems they form teams just to break them up for one of them to be the big star. It's a 50/50 shot of being the big star like Shawn Michaels and the Miz or falling into obscurity like Marty Jannetty and John Morrison.

I don't ever remember a time they had 6-7 teams who legitimately had a shot at winning the title even in the 1990s, 2000s or ever.
SlickyTrickyDamon is offline   Reply With Quote