Thread: Has the move to 3 hours been a good one for Raw?
View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 10:46 AM   #73
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
Good tv = good tv, regardless of time.

For the WWE, it's good in the sense that they're gaining additional revenue for the 3rd hour.


For the writing team and fans, it's close to burn out when you factor in Smackdown, and Main Event and Superstars to a lesser degree. It is tough with 5 hours of weekly tv to not overexpose characters, many whom aren't compelling to begin with. They really should be calling up more people to fill the quota they need.

Kind of funny, I remember a time where I would have loved more wrestling, and this much would have seemed like a dream come true.

Careful what you wish for, I guess.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote