Thread: The Ratings Debacle
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2013, 05:42 PM   #16
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by el bobbo View Post
We have all heard stuff about WWE ratings being in the tank, but very little about how we actually consume the product.
Really? People seem to talk about their viewing habits all the time.

M mostly YouTube or torrent stuff. I'm considering getting Hulu for a more reliable source I can watch more readily.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Edgar View Post
Yep. Also, I don't know if I'd class the company's current ratings as a debacle. Just growing pains in a down cycle. This is very reminiscent of 93-97 WWF, I feel.
You know, ratings have been declining for almost a decade now. At some point, people have to give up this whole "natural cycle" nonsense.

Keep in mind that these are ratings that are below what they actually panicked once upon a time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by seapig4 View Post
TV ratings only matter for shows that are in danger of being cancelled, since I doubt very much that RAW would ever be cancelled it don't matter.

I download it or youtube it btw
Ratings matter to any show that wants to make money. I'm assuming WWE wants their shows to make money.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote