Thread: Do title reigns matter?
View Single Post
Old 07-26-2013, 11:25 AM   #23
Hanso Amore
You can't teach that
 
Hanso Amore's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,337
Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Its the problem with multiple titles and the devalue of secondary title. When the only way you can add value to someone is by making them chamnion, its a waste.

Think of all the WWE title reigns from 1984-1993

Not a single wasted/forgettable reign. All were a big deal. Shit even Sgt Slaughter winning the title as an Iraqi was a big deal.

Then look at 2005 to now. Tons of crap flop reigns that were a waste. Not important.
Hanso Amore is offline   Reply With Quote